This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America
The Lord's prayer is given in two versions of orthography which are identical to each other. Either there's a mistake, or I'd suggest that only one version should be left. The right column can be used for English translation for better understanding and comparison. Jimitori (talk) 12:05, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Reasonablematics, as promised on your talk page, I've gone through your suggested edits line by line to reincorporate any useful content into the article.
I've added in what was sourced and on topic. I didn't add some stuff that was veering into tangents (see WP:COATRACK and WP:NOTEVERYTHING), or where the sourcing was unclear/not included. We should avoid WP:OR, too. I think this version combines the best of both edits, includes references, and is more up-to-date. Hopefully, it isn't too objectionable to anyone.
